header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Free-wheeling curbed

The requirement to give advance notice of mass cycle rides is a worrying incursion on civil liberties, says Seamus Burns

Since 1994, cyclists have gathered near the National Film Theatre on the South Bank, London, at a set time early in the evening of the last Friday of each month for a mass ride through the streets of London, dubbed “Critical Mass”, with 100 to 400 cyclists taking part. Those features of the cycle ride are fixed, but the route is not. Since 1994 over 150 monthly mass cycle rides have taken place.

The Metropolitan Police commissioner had unsuccessfully argued in the Divisional Court, comprised of Lord Justice Sedley and Mr Justice Gray (see Kay v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2006] EWHC 1536 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 304 (Jun)) that the cycle rides were processions which the organisers were required to give the police advance notice of under the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986), s 11 and that the organisers had failed to do this.

However, the Divisional Court held that the monthly Critical Mass cycle ride was one which was commonly or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll