header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Four tenants: one claimant

Four tenants have jointly paid a deposit for a residential property and one of them only has brought a claim against the landlord for its return at the end of the tenancy. Must the other three be joined as co-claimants and, if so, what happens if one or more of them has disappeared or is/are unwilling to litigate?

It is open to any one of the tenants to singularly bring the claim and then, if money was recovered in that claim, the lone claimant would be obliged to account to the co-tenants for their shares. The landlord would have a good defence to any claim subsequently brought against them by any of the co-tenants arising out of the same cause of action. Nevertheless, it is not inconceivable that the court might direct that the co-tenants be given an opportunity to be joined to the claim if it has material before it which suggests that the co-tenants might not receive their due share of the fruits of the litigation, particularly if the lone claimant is not in touch with them.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll