Are local authorities liable for abuse within foster placements, regardless of the child’s relationship to the foster parents? Christopher Ratcliffe traces recent case law
- The Court of Appeal has held that the relationship between foster parents and a local authority could be akin to employment to satisfy the requirements for vicarious liability, even where the foster parents and foster child were related. However, the court refused to lay down a blanket rule.
- This article considers the reasoning behind that decision, the implications for future cases and why the Court of Appeal was right to discount any motive on the part of the foster parents for fostering children into the equation.
Vicarious liability is a rule of responsibility which assigns liability to one party for torts (civil wrongs) committed by another. The responsible party may be blameless, and while the tortfeasor remains liable, the injured party may choose to pursue the responsible party for redress for several reasons, including that they may be in a better position to satisfy any award of damages.
Traditionally, vicarious liability only arose where there was a relationship
