Are we failing our armed forces? ask Andrew Buckham and Andrew Tucker
The scale of compensation payable to injured service personnel under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) is under scrutiny after details of the case of Lance Bombardier Ben Parkinson were highlighted by the media. Ben, aged 24, a soldier serving on an operational tour in Afghanistan, sustained multiple injuries as a result of a mine strike. Ben submitted an application under AFCS, a scheme described by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on its introduction in 2005 as a scheme that “gives modern, fair and simpler arrangements, which focuses help better on the more severely disabled”.
However, the award of £152,150 afforded to Ben under AFCS highlighted that there are significant problems in the way in which the scheme assesses compensation for service personnel who have suffered multiple injuries, and that the scheme needed to be urgently reviewed. Ben’s case has also brought into sharp focus the commitment and sacrifice members of the British armed forces make, what they may expect to receive when they are severely injured, and whether or not
