header-logo header-logo

19 September 2014 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

A foreign affair

professionpamplin

Chris Pamplin looks at some of the expert witness issues that can arise in litigation that crosses EU member state borders

In a shrinking commercial world, lawyers may well find themselves involved in some form of cross-border litigation. Such litigation carries with it potential difficulties and, not least among these, is the form and manner in which experts are appointed and expert evidence is taken. Within the EU, however, there have been attempts to “streamline” the process, but these can throw up their own problems.

When you crash your car in France

In cases in which some obligation arises (other than through contract) that have a connection with more than one European state, such as road traffic accidents involving citizens of more than one EU member state, EU Regulations (Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 (Brussels I)) permit the injured party to bring an action directly against the insurer in the courts in the country in which the claimant is domiciled, provided that a direct action is permitted and the insurer is also domiciled in a member state (

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll