header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Marc Weller
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Opinion , Public , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A foregone conclusion?

Would an independent Scotland automatically be a member state of the EU? Marc Weller investigates

It has become a matter of some controversy whether the Scottish government has obtained legal advice on Scotland’s EU status post-independence. The substantive question of Scotland’s future EU membership is, however, of no less importance than the question of whether or not legal advice was received. After all, the decision of many voters in the referendum on independence may depend on whether or not continuous EU membership would be guaranteed in case secession is achieved.

The Scottish nationalists have claimed that the matter is a foregone conclusion—membership is automatic. They have invoked some legal authority in favour of this proposition, including the views of the former president of the European Court of Justice, Lord MacKenzie-Stuart. More recently, the Scottish first minister, Alex Salmond, has opined, somewhat more nebulously, that the issue would be addressed “from within the context of the EU”.

On the other hand, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office reportedly warned, through a spokesman, that continued membership cannot be taken for granted.

No less a figure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll