header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Alison Mayfield
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Force of nature

Alison Mayfield examines the frustrations of force majeure

The common law doctrine of frustration comes into play when a contract becomes impossible to perform, or can only be performed in a way that is substantially different from what was originally set out in the contract. The effect is that the parties to the contract will be excused from further performance under the contract. However, frustration only applies in the absence of an express provision by the parties dealing with such events. Such a clause is usually called a force majeure clause.

What is force majeure?

Force majeure is literally translated as: superior forces. In common language it is an unexpected and disruptive event that may operate to excuse a party from their obligations under a contract. Force majeure is only recognised in English law if it is specifically provided for in the terms of a contract.

Why have a force majeure clause?

The purpose of a force majeure clause is to define, more or less precisely, the circumstances in which a party to a contract can be excused from performing its contractual obligations,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll