header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Dan Mccauley
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Flying high

A commonsense approach is plane obvious, says Dan McCauley

Accidents at work can often lead to hefty compensation claims and in high-profile cases, the damage to an employer’s reputation is often difficult to recover from. However, away from the headlines many courts are taking a commonsense approach to claims for damages following accidents in the workplace. 

Claims for injuries occurring while an employee is at work can also adversely affect businesses through a loss output, damage to their reputation and increasing insurance rates, all before the case is even heard in court. But as a recent case demonstrates, defendant employers should not always have to worry that the courts will hold them liable for injuries caused in these kinds of accidents so long as they have implemented the relevant health and safety procedures correctly.

In Hough v Monarch Airlines Limited,  the claimant was employed by the defendant airline as a cabin purser. Her duties during the course of a flight included, amongst other things, supplying passengers with DVD digi players and these were dispensed by means of a trolley stored onboard.

On 9 August 2006 during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll