header-logo header-logo

18 March 2011 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Flexi time?

How flexible are you, asks Sarah Johnson

Although fathers have the right to request flexible working, many feel reluctant to do so because of the stigma attached, according to the deputy prime minister recently. He added that current rules are based on a view of life in which mothers stay at home and fathers are the only breadwinners. Planned consultation will consider both a truly flexible system of shared parental leave the government aims to introduce in 2015 and extending the right to request flexible working to all employees.

More immediate changes are also due. Certain carers of adults and of children under 17 currently have rights to request flexible working. These rights will be extended to carers of children under 18 from April 2011.

In addition, paternity rights are being enhanced. Currently, statutory paternity leave is limited to at most two weeks’ paid leave within 56 days of a child’s birth or placement for adoption. Parents of children whose expected week of birth begins, or who are matched for adoption, on or after 3rd April 2011 will have greater flexibility.

The Additional Paternity Leave

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll