header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A fleeting fad?

155160048

Is Collaborative Family Law a real option or just a passing craze, asks Edward Heaton

With the government actively encouraging individuals to resolve family disputes through mediation rather than relying on the increasingly over-burdened court system, it would seem that Collaborative Family Law (CFL), a further alternative to litigation, has arrived on the scene at exactly the right time.

What is it?

CFL remains a relatively new concept to England and Wales and could be mistaken for being just one more form of alternative dispute resolution (or just “dispute resolution”, as we are now being encouraged to call it) to add to the many others that already exist. There is, however, perhaps more to CFL than to other methods of dispute resolution, which makes it stand out from the crowd and goes some way to explaining why family lawyers across the country have been undertaking the training required to enable them to practise Collaboratively. But, what exactly is CFL, how does it work and what are its potential benefits?

CFL is a process through which people seek to resolve family disputes through

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll