header-logo header-logo

Fixing courts ‘achievable’ & ‘vital’

25 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Dead seagulls and excrement-soaked floors are just two of the hazards causing delays in court buildings in the past 12 months, a Law Society report has found

The birds were found rotting in the roof insulation at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court in July. Consequently, ‘the court had to close because maggots were literally raining down onto the lobby’, according to an anonymous source quoted in the report. Elsewhere, cases have ground to a halt due to asbestos, mould, inadequate air conditioning and dilapidated toilets.

At Hull Crown Court, lawyers endured several sewage leaks in the robing room, caused by a burst pipe ‘spraying personal items, carpet and desks etc,’ an anonymous source said. ‘This was a significant health risk which led to several counsel and solicitors being very ill.’

The report, ‘State of the courts’, published this week, investigates whether the court infrastructure is fit for purpose. Almost two-thirds (63%) of solicitors surveyed have experienced delays in hearings in the past 12 months due to poor infrastructure.

One in five said the technology in the courts was ‘not at all’ fit for purpose—a 7% increase compared to the 2022 ‘State of the courts’ survey. Tech glitches included poor quality remote hearings, software problems and a lack of working plug sockets in conference rooms and the courts.

Difficulties were heightened for solicitors with a disability, due to a lack of ramps and working lifts or other accessibility limitations. 45% said the physical state of the courts are ‘not at all fit for purpose’, compared to 25% of solicitors with no disability.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson highlighted that the Crown Court backlog is about 77,000 cases, while two-thirds of care cases in family courts take longer than the 26-week time limit.

‘Behind each of these statistics are tens of thousands of adults and children who could be freed from limbo and move forward with their lives if they could have their day in court,’ Atkinson said.

‘This could be an easy win for the government, which has rightly recognised the need for capital and sustained investment in the courts but must go further.’

Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll