header-logo header-logo

26 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fixed fees worry the City

Concern over risks to profitability due to demand for fixed fees

City law firms are experiencing mounting concern about clients’ demands for fixed fees rather than hourly rates. 

The firms fear the rising number of fixed-fee requests will hit their profitability and force them to make permanent adjustments in pricing practice, according to Thomson Reuters Legal annual research among finance directors at the top 100 UK law firms.

Nearly half the finance directors surveyed considered fixed-fee work a high risk to profitability. Only 12% said the trend posed a low risk.

Fixed fees present a higher risk because work can overrun or unforeseen issues arise with the firm powerless to charge for the extra hours involved. Firms are also under pressure to tender competitively, and may under-estimate the cost of work.

Sam Steer, head of large law for Thomson Reuters UK Legal, says: “Finance directors are well aware that getting pricing right is critical to minimising cost over-runs, but this is still relatively new territory for lawyers. Many are still finding their way in assessing costs accurately, particularly for complex or contentious work and at the same time they are under intense pressure to submit competitively-priced tenders which means pricing has to be very tight.”

The firms ranked downward pressure on fees from clients as their number one threat to profitability—more than three-quarters of those surveyed cited demand for discounted fees as the most significant risk faced by their firm, compared to just over half in 2011.

Just over a quarter of finance directors said they were also very concerned about clients consolidating their legal panels—thus reducing the amount of potential work available and driving down fees for those firms that are retained.

Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll