header-logo header-logo

27 September 2013 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7577 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

In a fix

200544524-001

Escape from fixed costs in the fast track will prove difficult, says Patrick Allen

Fixed costs in the fast track have finally arrived. The rules are found at CPR45.29 A-L. From 1 August personal injury claims worth up to £25,000 must enter the portal. If they then exit the portal eg because liability is not admitted, they become subject to a fixed cost regime where the amount depends on the stage at which settlement is reached, the damages and the case type. This applies to causes of action occurring after 31 July 2013.

Fears realised

Fast track fixed costs have been threatened for the last 15 years and resisted for good reason by claimant lawyers because they feared:

  • Once fixed they would never go up again.
  • They would be fixed too low.
  • Escape would be all but impossible.
  • The amount of work needed would depend largely on complexity and the defendants’ conduct of the case.

All these fears are now realised.

The process of arriving at the level of fixed costs was tortuous. Professor Fenn was put to work on data and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll