header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Lisa Hatch
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fit for purpose?

Lisa Hatch weighs up the evidential value of the new style sick notes for disability discrimination claims

Most employers and employment lawyers will at some point have come across GP’s sick notes produced by absent employees. However, on 6 April 2010 the old style Med 3 and Med 5 sick notes familiar to many were replaced with a new-style “fit note”. Officially titled a “Statement of Fitness for Work” the new note is now being issued by GPs to patients off sick from work. The new single form will be used for both statutory sick pay and social security claims (see the Social Security (Medical Evidence) and Statutory Sick Pay (Medical Evidence) (Amendment) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/137) and is only issued if the patient is off sick for more than seven days. GPs are required to tick a box on the form to confirm whether the patient is “not fit for work” or “may be fit for work taking account of the following advice”. In a crucial change from the old sick notes, GPs are also required, if they tick the “may be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll