header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Firms warned on dirty money

A review of money-laundering compliance at 59 law firms has resulted in 26 firms being referred to Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary processes.

The SRA issued a stern warning this week that it will take ‘strong action’ against firms with inadequate procedures in place, after its review revealed a ‘significant minority’ were not doing enough to meet their obligations under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2016/692).

The firms were chosen because they create and administer trusts and companies on behalf of clients, a high-risk area for exploitation by criminals.

Poor risk assessment procedures were uncovered at 24 firms, including four firms with no risk assessment procedures in place at all. Inadequate customer due diligence was found at 14 firms.

Only ten firms had submitted suspicious activity reports (SARs) in the past two years. The SRA notes this tallies with concerns raised by the National Crime Agency that generally law firms are not being proactive enough in looking to identify and then report suspicious activity.

The review found no evidence of actual money laundering or intent to become involved in criminal activities.

The SRA has now launched a second review, of 400 law firms.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, warned: ‘Too many firms are falling short.

‘Those firms should be on notice that compliance is not optional. They need to improve swiftly. Where we have serious concerns that a firm could be enabling money laundering, we will take strong action.’

John Binns, partner at BCL Solicitors, said HMRC fines for non-compliance with money laundering regulations rose by more than 90% in 12 months last year as ‘part of an increasingly hostile environment’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll