header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms pay price for data breaches

Monetary penalties for “serious” data protection breaches

Two organisations, one a county council, have been served the first monetary penalties for serious breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998.
Organisations can be fined up to £500,000 for serious breaches of the 1998 Act. Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham used these powers last week for the first time, fining Hertfordshire County council £100,000 and employment services company, A4e £60,000.

Graham said: “These first monetary penalties send a strong message to all organisations handling personal information. Get it wrong and you do substantial harm to individuals and the reputation of your business.”

Hertfordshire’s data breach concerned two separate instances of faxes sent to the wrong person by members of the childcare litigation unit.
The first fax involved highly sensitive details of a child sexual abuse case then before the courts. The second fax contained details of child care proceedings and domestic violence records.

Ruling the council failed to take sufficient steps to prevent the second mistake occurring, Graham said it “was difficult to imagine information more sensitive”.

A4e’s breach happened when an employee had their laptop stolen—it contained unencrypted personal information of more than 24,000 people who had used community legal advice centres in Hull and Leicester. Graham ruled A4e had breached the Act by failing to encrypt the laptop.
Both organisations reported the breach to the ICO.

Tom Morrison, partner, Rollits, says: “Both of these cases show how everyday activities can have serious and unintended consequences for an organisation, its staff and the individuals whose personal information may be compromised. Every IT team across the country should be making sure that mobile devices are properly encrypted, and their management teams should be supporting those efforts not least because the senior people within an organisation can in some situations have personal liability for a data protection breach.

“On a practical level, any organisation which provides employees with laptops should identify whether information really needs to be held on that laptop or whether the laptop should be used to connect to a secure service hosted remotely.”
 

Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll