header-logo header-logo

23 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms lose out in family bid

Family lawyers group Resolution has criticised the Legal Services Commission (LSC) bidding process after one in 10 family law legal aid firms lost its contract.

In September firms bid for new contracts to run family and family and housing legal aid services, due to start early in 2012. Every law firm that applied had heard back by the beginning of this week.

According to initial LSC analysis, 92% of applicants have been awarded a contract.

David Emmerson, chairman of Resolution’s legal aid committee, says: “It is a considerable surprise that so many applicants for the tender failed in what was a non-competitive bid.

“There were none of the quality criteria and panel membership issues that distinguished firms in the failed 2010 tender. It is understood that almost all failures relate to technical issues, but it would be terrible to lose fundamentally good firms from public service on the basis of simple errors.”

Emmerson queries the number of questions within the bid process which “appeared unneccessary” and hopes that issues can be resolved through the appeals process. The eTendering portal by which firms applied for the legal aid contract was “an unneccessarily frustrating hurdle”, he adds. He expressed sympathy for those who work in and rely upon those organisations that failed in the bid.

 

Issue: 7491 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll