header-logo header-logo

09 August 2023
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fines hike proposed in misconduct crackdown

Legal professionals could face tougher financial penalties and heightened scrutiny, under plans put forward by super-regulator the Legal Services Board (LSB)

The LSB, which oversees all ten legal services regulators, announced last week that it will review the tools available to regulators with a view to raising the financial penalties at their disposal and enabling them to proactively gather information and share intelligence about wrongdoing.

Alan Kershaw, LSB Chair, said: ‘For some time, we have been concerned that a lack of effective fining powers among some regulators, particularly the SRA, may hamper their ability to tackle wilful and serious misconduct.’

Anna Bradley, chair, SRA Board, said: ‘We have, for some years now advocated that the SRA be given unlimited fining powers to create that deterrent more quickly.

‘While individual solicitors should face the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) for serious wrongdoing (and in appropriate cases forfeit their right to practise), that does not preclude the SRA from also fining them and their firm.’

However, the Law Society strongly opposes further hikes in penalties.

Law Society President Lubna Shuja said: ‘There is no evidence that the SRA’s current fining powers are insufficient.

‘The SRA does not exist on its own in the regulatory process. It sits alongside the SDT, which already has draconian powers to sanction any wrongdoing in the solicitors’ profession. These include not only fining powers but also the ability to remove a solicitor from the profession altogether.

‘The SDT remains the appropriate forum for serious cases of alleged misconduct. Further extending the SRA’s powers risks undermining the SDT’s role and authority and potentially reducing the sanctions imposed on bad conduct.’

The maximum penalty the SRA can impose was raised from £2,000 to £25,000 in July, 2022.

The SRA receives more than 10,000 complaints about firms and individual lawyers each year. In 2021/22, it referred 1,741 matters for investigation, resulting in 301 sanctions of which 49 were fines. It referred 76 cases of serious misconduct to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT). 

The government is currently considering increasing the maximum SRA penalty for misconduct that falls into the category of economic crime.

Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll