header-logo header-logo

22 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Fines hike for solicitors & law firms

Proposals to fine firms up to 5% of their annual turnover for breaches of the professional rule book have been confirmed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

While fixed penalties of £750 or £1,500 will be charged for low-level misconduct, such as failing to publish the required costs or complaints information, fines for both individuals and firms for more serious breaches will be based on percentages of gross income or turnover. These would range from 0.2% to 5%.

The SRA intends to pilot the use of personal impact statements in cases of sexual misconduct, discrimination or harassment. It will also publish information on disciplinary decisions for longer periods, ranging from three years for warnings and fines to permanently for strike-off decisions.

The new regime is due to take effect on 30 May, subject to Legal Services Board approval.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: 'When we need to step in and take action it is important that we have a transparent and effective disciplinary approach in place.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll