header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / William Chapman
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Community care , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A fine balance

How will a new code of practice affect the rights of money
laundering suspects? asks William Chapman
 

The government is considering responses from “stakeholders” to its proposed new code of practice for investigators under Ch 2 of Pt 8 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) issued, as required, under s 377. The code regulates the wide-ranging powers available to investigators of money laundering offences under Pt 8. The Home Office intends to publish responses within three months. The proposed code contains only minor modifications to the existing code. Some of these have been consequential amendments following amendments made to POCA 2002 by the Serious Crime Act 2007. There have been a few additions, but for the most part the consultation process has been an opportunity for comment upon the working of the existing code since POCA 2002 came into force.

 

LOWER CRIME V HUMAN RIGHTS

Those comments are likely to focus on the balance that needs to be struck between the desire of the state to reduce serious crime and the human rights of the subject.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll