header-logo header-logo

14 September 2011
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Findings of failure by Baha Mousa inquiry

Gage inquiry accuses Ministry of Defence of “corporate failure”

A year-long inquiry into the death of Baha Mousa has blamed “corporate failure” at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for the use of banned interrogation techniques.

Mousa, an Iraqi citizen, died with 93 injuries in British Army custody in Basra in 2003.

The inquiry, led by Sir William Gage, found that Mousa died after suffering an “appalling episode of gratuitous violence” by British soldiers.

It found the so-called “five techniques” for interrogation banned by the UK government in the 1970s were used by British forces in Iraq. They include hooding, white noise, sleep deprivation, food deprivation and painful stress positions.

Sir William’s report said a large number of soldiers must have known what was happening to Mousa and his colleagues from the hotel where he was arrested. He criticised the lack of training of soldiers in handling prisoners and blamed the MoD for failing to remind operational forces that the techniques were banned.

Sapna Malik, partner at Leigh, Day & Co, who represents Mousa’s family, said: “Sir William has found that the serious assaults ‘were not perpetrated by just one or two rogue individuals’, but names 19 individual soldiers, including three senior non-commissioned officers.

“In light of the cogent and serious findings we now expect that the military and civilian prosecuting authorities of this country will act to ensure that justice is done.”

Issue: 7481 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll