header-logo header-logo

Finding the right fit

236039
Charles Pigott explores reasonable adjustments, trial periods & alternative employment
  • The latest reasonable adjustments ruling from the Employment Appeal Tribunal consolidates our understanding of how the duty applies when an employee can no longer perform their current role due to disability, but wishes to be re-deployed.

Like many issues relating to the reasonable adjustments duty, the story starts with the House of Lords’ judgment in Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32.

In one of the earliest disability discrimination cases to reach the House of Lords, Ms Archibald’s claim was brought under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995). The definition of the duty to make reasonable adjustments in DDA 1995 differed in a number of respects from its successor in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). However, the underlying principles are sufficiently close for cases decided under DDA 1995 to continue to be authoritative on the issues addressed in this article.

Under DDA 1995, one circumstance in which the duty could be triggered was if any ‘arrangements made by or on behalf of the employer place the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll