header-logo header-logo

17 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Financial services & markets

Re Names at Lloyd’s for 1992 and prior years of account represented by Equitas Ltd Re Equitas Insurance Ltd (formerly Speyford Ltd) [2009] EWHC 1595 (Ch); [2009] All ER (D) 73 (Jul)

The court’s power, conferred by s 111 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, to sanction a business transfer scheme was subject to a number of jurisdictional threshold conditions set by Pt VII of the 2000 Act, namely: (i) the scheme had to be a business transfer scheme; (ii) the ‘requirements’ imposed by s 108(1), to be found in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Control of Business Transfers) (Requirements on Applicants) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/3625, had to be complied with save and to the extent that the court had waived them; (iii) by s 109(1), there had to be a report on the terms of the scheme by a person fulfilling the qualifications set out in s 109(2) and the report had to be in a form approved by the Financial Services Authority; and (iv) by s 111(2), the court had to be satisfied that the appropriate certificates had been obtained

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll