header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Finance on family breakdown

Validity of a post-nuptial agreement

NA v MA [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) (Jan), Baron J attracted comment in the press and has already featured in NLJ. It was a truly sad story, though for once the solicitors’ profession came out of it better than the medics and the barristers. The wife (W) had discussed her anxieties with her doctor who promptly discussed them with her overbearing husband and members of the Bar seem to have done little to smooth the court’s path to judgment.

The main legal issue revolved around the efficacy of a “post nuptial agreement”, that is to say an agreement on the basis of which the parties were intended to resume cohabitation. The agreement had been negotiated whilst the parties were still in the throes of dealing with a very difficult relationship. The husband, the judge said, had offered the agreement on a “take it or leave it basis” as the only way to achieve a reconciliation in the marriage. The parties were still living together and, as the judge held, W was being bullied by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll