header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

finance on family breakdown

EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES IN FAMILY PROCEEDINGS

In S v S (M Intervening) [2006] EWHC 2892 (Fam), [2006] All ER (D) 229 (Nov) the wife (W) had retained the former matrimonial home (the property) upon the parties’ divorce in 1989. The husband (H) had a charge-back of one-third realisable when the children ceased to be dependent, W remarried or cohabited permanently or she died—standard Mesher terms. H was required to pay periodical payments for W and the children. In 1993, said W, H agreed to remit his charge on the property if W agreed to forego her entitlement to the arrears then due and to any future payments.

 In 1995 W’s mother (M) moved to and then bought a half-share in the property; but on the assumption of both W and M that H no longer had any charge on, nor other interest in, the property. M said she and H had had separate discussions on the subject. H had not registered his charge with Land Registry. W and M’s agreement was not formalised in writing.

H denied his agreement with W and that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll