header-logo header-logo

28 March 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The final fight

web_mason

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate round-up

In the case of Marley v Rawlings and Anor [2014] UKSC 2, [2014] 1 All ER 807, Alfred Rawlings and his wife Maureen Rawlings executed wills drafted by their solicitor on 17 May 1999. The wills were identical; each spouse left his or her estate to the other, and then to Terry Marley, who they treated as their son.

By an oversight, the solicitor gave each spouse the other’s draft will, which were then signed in error.

Mrs Rawlings died in 2003. Her estate passed to Mr Rawlings without anyone noticing the error, which only came to light when Mr Rawlings died in August 2006. Mr and Mrs Rawlings’ two sons challenged the validity of the will that Mr Rawlings had signed. If it was invalid, Mr Rawlings would have died intestate and the sons would inherit the estate.

Mr Marley sought rectification of the will signed by Mr Rawlings under s 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 (AJA 1982) so that it would contain what was in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll