header-logo header-logo

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fightback against scams

Rip-off traders & scam merchants targeted by Law Commissions

Consumers would be given extra protection against rip-off traders and scam merchants, under legal reforms proposed by the Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission.

The commissioners’ report, Consumer Redress for Misleading and Aggressive Practices, published last week, recommends a new legal right of redress against traders that carry out misleading or aggressive practices. Consumers would be entitled to a refund or a discount on the price, and damages could be available if the unfair practice caused additional loss. The new law would also cover situations where companies aggressively harass consumers for payment, where remedies would include refund or damages for distress.

Law Commissioner David Hertzell says: “By simplifying the law, our recommended reforms will give more confidence to consumers and help drive rogue traders out of the market place, where currently they damage the reputation and livelihood of good, honest businesses.”

Citizens Advice chief executive Gillian Guy says: “The law has neglected to recognise that people should get their money back when they have been subjected to pressure selling.

“Complex laws on misrepresentation have also failed consumers who have been blatantly misled by sales people. We need a simple consumer law to help consumers get a refund or compensation in these cases so that shoppers aren’t left with a sting in their pocket, and we need it fast.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll