header-logo header-logo

30 January 2019
Issue: 7826 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Company , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Fewer partners in court

The number of partnership disputes heard in the High Court has dropped 20% in a year, although employment lawyers predict Brexit disruption could cause an uptick.

A mere 28 cases in 2017, compared to 35 cases in 2016, concerned partnership rows. Relatively few such disputes go to court as many partners prefer to resolve their difficulties privately through arbitration. 

However, according to Ivor Adair, partner at Fox & Partners, which gathered the statistics, the figures are likely to rise for two reasons: lower disclosure requirements introduced this month, which may lower costs; and ‘Brexit-related economic shocks. Tightening trading conditions heighten disputes between partners about how lower profits are shared out or over any capital contributions that might be required. These conditions also lead to an increase in the number of partnerships that are dissolved.’

Issue: 7826 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Company , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll