header-logo header-logo

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Fewer divorces but longer delays

Couples are postponing their divorce due to uncertainties caused by Brexit, family lawyers say.

According to the Family Court Quarterly Statistics for April to June 2019, published last week, 28,144 divorce petitions were made, a fall of 13%, while financial remedy cases fell 5%. Divorces take longer on average, up five weeks to 33 weeks for decree nisi and up three weeks to 58 weeks for Decree Absolute. Only 41% of care proceedings meet the 26-week target―the average time is 33 weeks.

Desmond O’Donnell, partner at Thomson Snell & Passmore, attributed the decrease in couples divorcing to ‘the uncertainty over Brexit, based on their perception that their (or their spouse’s) employment position is less secure now’.

Other reasons included ‘difficulty in selling the matrimonial home, which is often the most valuable asset’ and the fact many couples are choosing to cohabit rather than marry.

Lawyers also lamented increased delays in the family courts.

O’Donnell said cases are taking longer due to ‘various factors, including more individuals acting in person who often file incorrect paperwork, which adds to the court’s workload and delays the progress of the case; a decrease in the number of full time judges and/or an increase in the judge’s workload, all of which means it takes the court longer to process divorces or fix financial hearings’.

Deborah Jeff, partner at Seddons, said: ‘The figures reflect why frustration is being felt by court users―the court process is slowing down considerably.’

Laura Burrows, family associate at Collyer Bristow, said ‘Although the Family Court continues to move towards online divorce, it is under immense pressure. The regional divorce centres set up in 2015 are experiencing high volumes of work and staff shortages, and delays have reached unprecedented levels, impacting on divorcing couples who are unable to move on with their lives and facing increasing legal fees.’

Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll