header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fees hike challenged

The Law Society has launched a blistering attack on Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals to hike asylum and immigration tribunal fees by more than 500%.

Law Society president Jonathan Smithers said: “Access to justice for all through the tribunal must trump the “full cost recovery” imperative driving the MoJ’s proposal.

“A significant proportion of appeals that reach the tribunal are upheld. Yet the MoJ itself estimates the 500% fee increase would lead to a 20-40% drop in appeals. Families making joint appeals, where the fee is payable by each family member, will be particularly hard hit, so a family of five would have to pay £4,000 compared to the £800 fee for a single person, though both receive the same ‘service’.”

Smithers said profits from visa applications should be used to fund the tribunal, pointing out that the Home Office charged a fee of £991 for an application for indefinite leave to remain in 2013 compared to an estimated administrative cost of £255. The fees for visas increased in March.

Issue: 7702 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll