header-logo header-logo

11 September 2014 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Fee remission: the new legal aid?

coverimage_0

Could fee remission mitigate the legal aid drought? Peter Thompson QC offers some tips

Denying a litigant access to a lawyer is to deny him access to justice. Every lawyer knows that. But we now have another impediment to justice that is becoming increasingly prominent—payment of the court fee. This requirement now runs across all civil litigation in the courts and also the employment tribunals. It is not chicken feed. Take claims within the small claims limit. A claimant owed £3,001 has to pay £540 for a day in court and for a claim of £5,001 the levy is £790. And the defendant with a judgment in default has to act promptly not just to apply to set it aside but also to get £155 together to pay Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service.

Civil legal aid used to cover payment of the fees as part of the government-funded service. But today almost all the funding has been withdrawn for contract cases: all that remains is a litigation subsidy in the form of fee remission. In the bad old

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll