header-logo header-logo

22 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fears that video tax hearings could be ‘temperamental’

Taxpayers should exercise caution before taking part in a video tax appeal pilot, a leading solicitor has warned.

Court hearings conducted entirely via video are to be piloted this spring, starting with tax appeals. HMCTS wrote to potential parties last week, inviting them to take part.

The video hearings would take place over the internet, with each participant logging in from a location of their choice using a webcam and, for the purposes of the pilot, the judge located in the courtroom. The format and process of the hearing would be the same as in a physical courtroom, and the judge would have discretion over whether or not to use a video hearing. HMCTS said it is working closely with the judiciary to ‘ensure the majesty of a physical courtroom will be upheld’.

However, Pinsent Masons tax partner Steven Porter, who regularly handles tax disputes including complex and group litigation, said: ‘The government’s video hearing pilot is undoubtedly a step towards the future, but will surely suffer a series of teething pains in ensuring the service works as it should.

‘The current video conferencing facilities of the tribunals/courts are extremely temperamental. Taxpayers with a hearing longer than a few hours should be cautious of joining the pilot, particularly if they are to give evidence.

‘Often in longer hearings the judge gains a lot from interaction with witnesses, and taxpayers wouldn’t want the judge’s opportunity to interact or to make assessments of the witnesses to be diminished. That said, for the right cases this is undeniably a step in the right direction.’

Justice minister Lucy Frazer, said: ‘We are spending £1bn on transforming and modernising the justice system. Video hearings have the potential to improve access to justice and speed up cases.’

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll