header-logo header-logo

23 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , International , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Fears for refugees

Punishing refugees who seek asylum in the UK is at odds with voters’ views, according to a poll of 1,954 respondents, weighted to reflect the UK population, commissioned by the Law Society

Under the Nationality and Borders Bill, which returned to the House of Commons this week, refugees who make their own way to the UK would be given only temporary protection and few rights while those who apply for asylum before travelling to the UK would receive the full level of support available. However, the Law Society points out that very few refugees are able to do the latter.

I Stephanie Boyce, Law Society president, urged MPs to keep Lords amendments removing punitive measures. Otherwise, the bill’s provisions ‘almost certainly put the UK in breach of the [1951] United Nations Refugee Convention’.

Boyce said: ‘More than two thirds of people (65%) said refugees who have to take clandestine routes to reach safety in the UK should have the same rights as refugees who are brought here by the government.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll