header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Julie Exton
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The family revolution

nlj_april_17_exton

Is the Family Court a brave—or terrifying—new world, asks Julie Exton

The family arena has undergone an enormous change since my appointment 15 years ago.

Soon the colourful divorce files that brighten up my room will disappear and be replaced by buff-coloured civil files. And, why is that? It is thought appropriate—and I do not disagree—that the routine work of certifying entitlement to a divorce can be wrested from the hands of district judges and, instead, processed by legal advisers. On top of that, divorce applications will be centralised in only a few centres on each Circuit. Here on the Western Circuit, Southampton will bear that particular burden, tiny Bury St Edmunds for the whole of the South East Circuit but, elsewhere, there may be two or three divorce centres. Of course, until the legal advisers adjust to their new role, there will be great pressure on the district judges who sit in the divorce centres to assist and support them.

Consent orders

One of the real issues that flows from this change is what is to happen to financial remedy consent orders. A relatively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll