header-logo header-logo

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Family pulls together

‘The Road Ahead’ set out for family courts
Senior family judge, Sir Andrew McFarlane has set out a road map for remote working and social distancing in the family courts in the next six months.

The document, ‘The Road Ahead’, draws on a report into remote hearings in the family court published by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory in May. It advises family lawyers to assume social distancing restrictions will remain in place for ‘many months’ and the ‘normal court working environment’ will not be achieved until at least the end of 2020 or the spring of 2021. Consequently, ‘apparent potential unfairness’ which justified adjournment for a short period of time ‘must now be re-evaluated’.

Sir Andrew, President of the Family Division, said: ‘The need to achieve finality in decision-making for children and families, the detrimental effect of delay and the overall impact on the wider system of an ever-growing backlog must form important elements in judicial decision making alongside the need for fairness to all parties.’

However, various steps to reduce the potential for unfairness have been identified, which means more cases can proceed, he said. For example, the easing of lockdown gives lay parties the option of taking part in remote hearings from their solicitor’s office or other location where IT support is available.

Meanwhile, volumes of private and public cases have continued at pre-coronavirus levels, applications for domestic abuse injunctions have remained the same or, in certain inner-city areas, ‘significantly risen’. Sir Andrew predicted a ‘surge’ in child protection cases once more children came out of lockdown.

He urged judges and lawyers to keep submissions and judgments brief and relevant, as time is short. Read the full document at: bit.ly/3cQS39I.

Meanwhile, the High Court has begun a judicial review of the legal aid means test, brought by a domestic abuse victim denied legal aid because she co-owns her house with her former partner.

Law Society president Simon Davis said victims could not access the equity in their home and were left ‘navigating the court system alone and representing themselves in court against their abusive ex-partner’.

The Ministry of Justice was reviewing the legal aid means test before the COVID-19 pandemic began.

Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll