header-logo header-logo

Family proceedings

16 October 2015
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re B (a child) (child arrangements order: prematurity of judge’s decision) [2015] EWCA Civ 974, [2015] All ER (D) 381 (Jul)

A child had told his paternal grandparents that he was being hit by his mother and bullied by his half-brother and cousin. The father retained him after that contact visit on the advice of the police and social worker. The mother applied for a child arrangements order and the father applied to maintain the status quo. The judge held that it was in the best interests to return the child to the mother. The Court of Appeal upheld that decision as it was one that had both been open to him and within his discretion.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll