header-logo header-logo

Family proceedings

01 May 2015
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

CS v ACS and another [2015] EWHC 1005 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 137 (Apr)

There was a final consent order made in proceedings between the husband and wife. The wife applied to vary the order. The husband contended that the wife had to appeal for which she needed permission. The Family Division held that the wife was entitled to proceed as she had and that she did not need the permission of the court, guidance was also given on Family Procedure Rules 2955/10, 30.3(1)(a).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

back-to-top-scroll