header-logo header-logo

13 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Family Procedure (Amendment) (No 2) Rules 2012 (SI 2012/1462)

The Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, r 31.17 currently provide that a registered order cannot be enforced until the time limit for appeals has expired.

Commencement date
1 July 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2010/2955 amended


Summary

Legislative Background

The time limit for appeals is set at one or two months (two months if the person bringing the appeal is habitually resident outside the UK).

What’s Changing?

The Rules amend the Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, r 31.17.

They give the court a discretion to permit urgent enforcement where necessary to secure a child’s welfare notwithstanding the general position that enforcement is suspended pending expiry of relevant appeal periods.

The amendment is necessary in order to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Health Service Executive v SC and AC, Attorney General intervening (case no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll