header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Mark Irving
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law

What does the coalition government mean for family law reform? Mark Irving reports

On 11 May 2010, having kissed hands with the Queen, David Cameron stood before the world’s press outside 10 Downing Street and declared: “I want us to build a society with stronger families…this is going to be hard and difficult work.”

The following day, a thumbnail coalition agreement was published which barely mentioned family policy, other than in the guise of taxation policy. On 20 May, the government published its Programme for government, but during its one hour long press launch, family policy was mentioned only in passing during Nick Clegg’s introductory statement. The programme itself lists 13 commitments for family and children, but some difficult family law issues have been sidestepped. There was no mention of family law reform in the Queen’s Speech on 25 May.

Deeper investigation reveals an important reason for such ducking and diving. In many respects Liberal Democrat and Conservative policies relating to the family have been, and evidently still are, diametrically opposed.
So what are the key issues? What have the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll