header-logo header-logo

29 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family justice review

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

The Family Mediation Council—which is made up of Resolution, the Law Society and other legal groups which support mediation—was responding to the green paper, Support for All—the Families and Relationships Green Paper, published last week, which proposes a major review of the family justice system. The proposals include compulsory mediation assessment meetings  for parents who seek to go to court to resolve residence or contact disputes. The council wants the government to go further and include parents seeking to resolve financial issues.

Deborah Turner, convenor of the Council, says: “To make consideration of mediation compulsory with regard to residence and contact disputes only, without including finances, imposes an artificial distinction. In reality, the children’s issues and the financial issues are almost always interlinked—particularly where residence is disputed.

A Resolution spokesperson said: “While we welcome a review of family law we do not believe the review is wide ranging enough. We would like it to look at other options like collaborative law and arbitration as well as mediation, as we believe that families should have access to a wide range of options and be able to choose the best option for them.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll