header-logo header-logo

05 February 2020 / David Burrows
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Family fortunes

15318
David Burrows identifies some familiar hot topics ripe for reform in 2020
  • Clarity of law and legal aid helps to approach a fair trial.
  • Secrecy: still a question in the family courts.

Around the turn of 2018–19 I speculated on what I would do if I ruled the family law world. I started from recognition that opaque—or badly drafted—law is injustice in itself, and ended with a plea for legal aid (see ‘Fixing family law: a wish list’, 169 NLJ 7823, p7). I identified eight further topics alongside these two. Family law reform should include, I suggested:

  • Clarity of law, for lack of clarity in law denies a fair trial.
  • Marriage laws: divorce law reform is important; but so too is the need for the law of marriage to be defined to fit 21st century secular and mixed religion society.
  • Child law procedure: how can a child know what rights he or she has when child law procedure is so complex?
  • Child Support Act 1991 with all its amendments and slough of regulations should be abolished and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll