header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family—Divorce—Arbitration

AI v MT [2013] EWHC 100 (Fam)

Family Division, Baker J, 30 January 2013

The High Court has approved a consent order based on a Beth Din procedure in divorce proceedings.

Henry Setright QC and Edward Devereux (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the applicant. Marcus Scott-Manderson QC and Teertha Gupta QC (instructed by Manches LLP) for the respondent. 

Both parties to a divorce proceeding were observant orthodox Jews. The father was Canadian and the mother was British. They married in London in August 2006 in a Jewish religious ceremony, followed by a civil ceremony in Toronto in October 2006. There were two children. Tensions arose and the mother applied for a prohibitive steps order against the father, to stop him removing one of the children from her care. After negotiations, the parties agreed to consider alternative dispute resolution by means of a Beth Din hearing in New York. They signed an agreement providing for all disputes arising out of the marriage to be determined by the Beth Din. The judge indicated that the court’s jurisdiction could not be ousted in that fashion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll