header-logo header-logo

08 January 2015
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family court predictions

Practice directions in the family law courts need “a good spring clean” to make them more easily understood, according to Geraldine Morris, head of LexisPSL Family.

“Changes have been made but old dates, references to former presidents and inconsistent language remains, which is a shame when the intention is to make the court system more intelligible to litigants in person,” Morris writes in this week’s NLJ. She points out that many practice directions had clearly been “cobbled together” when the Family Procedure Rules 2010 came into force in 2011. 

Nevertheless, confusion is perhaps inevitable given the huge scale of the project, she writes, and last year’s “avalanche” of family justice reform will continue apace in 2015. 

Further developments on the Financial Remedies Working Group (FRWG), led by Mr Justice Mostyn, which set out its recommendations in October, are expected in the early part of this year.

Issue: 7635 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll