header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family court back on track?

Ryder J plans family court twin-track following Norgrove report

The new family court will split care proceedings into “standard 26-week track” and “exceptional track” cases to help it meet the six-month deadline recommended by the Norgrove report.

In his fourth update, Mr Justice Ryder, the judge in charge of the modernisation of family justice, said the court would publish plain language “pathways”, incorporating peer-reviewed research and good-practice guidance. The “pathways” would describe the two “standard” and “exceptional” tracks with timetables for the children concerned and guidance on important case management steps, such as social work evidence, Cafcass advice, use of experts and placement options.

Ryder J said: “The [standard] pathway is likely to describe the case in which the threshold is agreed or is plain at the end of the first contested interim care order hearing by reason of the decision made at that hearing…The problem to be solved is essentially placement, which may of course include the success of rehabilitation, the feasibility of kinship options and consequential contact.

“Even as respects ‘planned and purposeful delay’ cases, decisions can be made in principle within 26 weeks.”

Former senior civil servant David Norgrove’s report into family justice, published in November, uncovered “shocking delays” in the system, with care proceedings taking an average of 13 months to resolve. He recommended that a six-month time limit be imposed on care proceedings to reduce uncertainty and distress for the children and families involved.

Meanwhile, the courts are having to deal with a rising number of care proceedings. Cafcass received 10,000 child care applications from local authorities in the last year—an all-time high.

Ryder J said a new case management system is now in place and will track every public law case issued from 2 April. “It will record all adjournments, use of experts and the reasons for the same. This is a major innovation…For the first time we will know why unplanned delay is occurring and we will be able to say so.”

The new family court is due to launch next year, and will replace the family proceedings court and the general family work currently undertaken by the county court and High Court. Fewer family law experts will be instructed under the new regime.

Issue: 7510 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll