header-logo header-logo

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family concern over litigants in person

Lawyers’ prime worry is the rise in litigants in person

One in five family lawyers cite the increased numbers of litigants in person (LiPs) as their prime concern and a sizeable majority think pensions will become increasingly important when dividing up a couple’s finances, new research shows.

The top issues for family lawyers, according to the annual Grant Thornton Matrimonial Survey, are LiPs (according to 21% of respondents), the lack of legal aid for most family law cases (17%) and courts not being fit for purpose (14%).

The results of the survey mirror those of previous years. Respondents were asked about the areas in which they would like to see a change in legislation. As in 2014, one quarter of lawyers would like to see no-fault divorces introduced, followed by the reintroduction of Calderbank offers generally in financial proceedings (20%) and protection for cohabiting couples (19%).

Divorcing couples have been given greater flexibility over their financial assets by the pensions legislation. More than three-quarters of respondents believe pensions will become more important in reaching financial settlements. However, 62% of solicitors think pensions will be treated as a more liquid asset only in cases where one or more of parties is over 55 years, and only 18% feel pensions will be treated as a more liquid asset in all cases.

Nick Andrews, partner at Grant Thornton UK, says: “The introduction of the single Family Court last year was a revolutionary step, yet professionals still remain concerned that the court system is not fit for purpose to support LiPs.”

Jo Edwards, chair of family law organisation Resolution, says she is not surprised by the survey results and that the lack of funding for legal representation is leading to “higher conflict during divorce”.

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll