header-logo header-logo

Family

12 September 2013
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Case law , Family
printer mail-detail

Re J (A Child) (contra mundum injunction) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 45 (Sep)

The court had the power both to relax and add to the “automatic restraints” on the publication of information relating to proceedings under the Children Act 1989 found in s 97 of the 1989 Act and s 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960. In exercising that jurisdiction the court had to conduct the balancing exercise described in the authorities. Although the court might, by an appropriate injunction, extend the anonymity of the child beyond the point at which s 97 of the Act ceased to have effect, the authorities expressed doubt as to the likely need for specific orders protecting a child’s identity beyond the conclusion of the proceedings. Further, while it might likewise afford anonymity to other participants in the process, for example, a local authority, it was established principle that such injunctions would not readily be granted. More generally, there was a compelling need for transparency in the family justice system as a matter of both principle and pragmatism. Furthermore, an injunction which could not otherwise be justified

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll