header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family

Re ML (a child) (use of Skype Technology) [2013] EWHC 2091 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 232 (Jul)

The judgment recorded the use made of Skype technology in two recent cases. The first case concerned the adoption of a girl from Nepal. The judge directed that the parents should be contacted and offered the opportunity to give their consent. It was not possible for the children's guardian to make those enquiries abroad. A local lawyer was engaged and arrangements were made for the court documents to be translated and sent to the lawyer. Using Skype, the guardian and the child's solicitor were able to witness in real time the parents signing the consent forms, and photographs of the events were taken. The process satisfied the judge that the parents had freely and unconditionally consented to the adoption, and also that they had received no financial inducement. The second case concerned an application for relocation to Columbia. Evidence was required from a witness in Columbia. She lived in a remote location with few options available to her in respect of video conference facilities. The judge refused an application by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll