header-logo header-logo

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family

Re X and Y (children) (executive summary of serious case review: reporting restrictions) [2012] EWCA Civ 1500, [2012] All ER (D) 213 (Nov)

The statutory regime in Wales governing the restriction of publication of material likely to lead to the identification of children following criminal proceedings in which a parent of the children was convicted of a serious offence relating to one of the children’s siblings comprised the Children Act 2004 and the Local Safeguarding Children Boards (Wales) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1705). That regime recognised the need to balance the various Art 8 and Art 10 rights in play, and indicated that the balance was to be struck by publishing an executive summary appropriately anonymised. The statutory scheme was plainly Convention compliant and carefully crafted to accommodate the Strasbourg “balancing exercise”. In each individual case, careful thought would need to be given to the identities of those who required anonymisation, and the degree of anonymisation required. The statutory scheme contemplated, and compliance with the Convention required, that what was published had to be anonymised to such an extent as was necessary to protect the Art 8 interests of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll