header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Families at war

Michael Tringham provides an update on family intrigue, delusion & greed

I am indebted to Charlotte Watts of the charity litigation team at Wilsons Solicitors LLP for highlighting a recent case about a family unhappy about a legacy to a charity.

She says of Ritchie, Ritchie and Others v National Osteoporosis Society and Others [2009] EWHC 709 (Ch) that “challenges based on testamentary capacity are becoming ever more common, and this increase is likely to continue as the population ages”.

Mrs Ritchie’s “delusions”

By a 1998 will, prepared by her solicitor eight years before she died, Mrs Ritchie left her entire £2.5m estate to the National Osteoporosis Society, apart from a £5,000 legacy to her local church. She had told her solicitor that her children (who received nothing) were well provided for and also referred to a history of violence towards her.

The Ritchie children claimed that their late mother suffered from a disorder of the mind which had poisoned her affections against them and these delusions had caused her to disinherit them. The Wilsons team report that the case turned on two points:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll