header-logo header-logo

27 October 2017
Issue: 7767 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fair & true: getting the balance right

nlj_7767_ramage

The meaning of ‘true and fair’ may be whatever accountants say it is, as Roderick Ramage explains

 

Section 393(1) of the Companies Act 2006 reads: ‘The directors of a company must not approve accounts for the purposes of this Chapter unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss …’. What meaning should the law give to the expression ‘true and fair’?

A starting point for the interpretation of statutes is at 332 in Macarthys Ltd v Smith [1979] 3 All ER 325: ‘As the meaning of the words [Equal Pay Act 1970, s 1(1) and (2)] is clear, and no ambiguity, whether patent or latent, lurks within them, under our rules for the construction of Acts of Parliament the statutory intention must be found within those words.’

Two differing means of finding the meaning of the words ‘true and fair view’ are these.

The Shorter OED

True: ‘Consistent with fact; agreeing with reality; representing the thing as it is.’.
Fair: ‘Free from bias, fraud, or injustice; equitable, legitimate’.
View:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll